Politics & Society
January Mon 23, 2012
I do not come at this issue as a Catholic special pleader, who wants only to protect my own, although it was a little bracing to realize that the president’s decision yesterday essentially told us, as Catholics, that there is no room in this great country of ours for the institutions our Church has built over the years to be Catholic in ways that are important to us. Nor, frankly, do I come at the issue as an anti-contraception zealot: I understand that many people, and good Catholics too, reach different conclusions on the matter although I must say that Humanae Vitae in its entirety reads better, and more presciently, every year. No, I come at this issue as a liberal and a Democrat and as someone who, until yesterday, generally supported the President, as someone who saw in his vision of America a greater concern for each other, a less mean-spirited culture, someone who could, and did, remind the nation that we are our brothers’ keeper, that liberalism has a long vocation in this country of promoting freedom and protecting the interests of the average person against the combined power of the rich, and that we should learn how to disagree without being disagreeable. I defended the University of Notre Dame for honoring this man, and my heart was warmed when President Obama said at Notre Dame: “we must find a way to reconcile our ever-shrinking world with its ever-growing diversity -- diversity of thought, diversity of culture, and diversity of belief. In short, we must find a way to live together as one human family.” To borrow from Emile Zola: J’Accuse! I accuse you, Mr. President, of dishonoring your own vision by this shameful decision. I accuse you, Mr. President, of failing to live out the respect for diversity that you so properly and beautifully proclaimed as a cardinal virtue at Notre Dame. Or, are we to believe that diversity is only to be lauded when it advances the interests of those with whom we agree? That’s not diversity. That’s misuse of a noble principle for ignoble ends. I accuse you, Mr. President, of betraying philosophic liberalism, which began, lest we forget, as a defense of the rights of conscience. As Catholics, we need to be honest and admit that, three hundred years ago, the defense of conscience was not high on the agenda of Holy Mother Church. But, we Catholics learned to embrace the idea that the coercion of conscience is a violation of human dignity. This is a lesson, Mr. President, that you and too many of your fellow liberals have apparently unlearned.
Calcio e altri Sport
Calciomercato Torino/ News, Guidoni (ag. Fifa): per Ventura un biennale. Lanzini, il prezzo ...
Calcio e altri Sport
Calciomercato Fiorentina/ News, Marilli (ag. Fifa): Montella rimane, Verratti possibile se... ...
Musica e concerti
GENTLESS3/ "Things We Lost", Carlo Natoli racconta il nuovo lavoro della band romana
Cinema, Televisione e Media
SONG'E NAPULE/ Il thriller dei Manetti Bros. che resta nascosto da un "velo"
SCUOLA/ Esame di stato, ecco la "trappola" che attende la Giannini
ARMENIA/ "Ho trovato laggiù il cuore più vero dell'Europa smarrita"
Read all News