martedì 9 febbraio 2010
Bipartisanship has a better name than it should: As often as not, it yields an anodyne moderation that is unequal to the tasks facing the nation. Last year, President Obama scaled back the stimulus bill in hopes of attracting GOP support (he got none), when we now realize the stimulus needed to be larger and longer. The fabled 9/11 Report was produced by a bipartisan consensus and was one of the most internally contradictory texts ever produced. People confuse bipartisanship with consensus, with acting in the national interest, when in fact it can merely result in even less useful or effective policies that conflate the interests of the two parties. Still, of all the many worries we should entertain about the country’s political life, the greatest is surely the general loss of confidence in government per se, the sense that government is some alien force obnoxious to our lives and interests, the idea that Washington is incapable of accomplishing anything good. This profoundly anti-democratic (small ‘d’) sensibility is first and foremost a moral failing, trusting in impersonal forces like "the market" or "science," rather than in our human capacity for self-governance. And so even if bipartisanship is only a facsimile of consensus, and not the genuine article, a facsimile is better than nothing. And, so, the swearing in of Senator Scott Brown represents a sign of hope for the country, and especially for the Democrats. Yes, in the short term, the Dems took the hit. But, going forward, Republicans cannot escape responsibility for governance and Democrats know going in to every debate that they must bring along some GOP Senators. As well, when you have five moderate Republicans on board, you do not have to jump to Sen. Lieberman’s mood swings. The resulting policies may or may not be improved in terms of delivering health care, prosecuting terrorists or jump starting the economy. But, the underlying concern, the concern to show that government can accomplish something on behalf of the citizens who elected it, that will be strengthened. NEXT PAGE CLICK BELOW >>
Bipartisanship has a better name than it should: As often as not, it yields an anodyne moderation that is unequal to the tasks facing the nation. Last year, President Obama scaled back the stimulus bill in hopes of attracting GOP support (he got none), when we now realize the stimulus needed to be larger and longer. The fabled 9/11 Report was produced by a bipartisan consensus and was one of the most internally contradictory texts ever produced. People confuse bipartisanship with consensus, with acting in the national interest, when in fact it can merely result in even less useful or effective policies that conflate the interests of the two parties.
Still, of all the many worries we should entertain about the country’s political life, the greatest is surely the general loss of confidence in government per se, the sense that government is some alien force obnoxious to our lives and interests, the idea that Washington is incapable of accomplishing anything good. This profoundly anti-democratic (small ‘d’) sensibility is first and foremost a moral failing, trusting in impersonal forces like "the market" or "science," rather than in our human capacity for self-governance. And so even if bipartisanship is only a facsimile of consensus, and not the genuine article, a facsimile is better than nothing.
And, so, the swearing in of Senator Scott Brown represents a sign of hope for the country, and especially for the Democrats. Yes, in the short term, the Dems took the hit. But, going forward, Republicans cannot escape responsibility for governance and Democrats know going in to every debate that they must bring along some GOP Senators. As well, when you have five moderate Republicans on board, you do not have to jump to Sen. Lieberman’s mood swings. The resulting policies may or may not be improved in terms of delivering health care, prosecuting terrorists or jump starting the economy. But, the underlying concern, the concern to show that government can accomplish something on behalf of the citizens who elected it, that will be strengthened.
NEXT PAGE
CLICK BELOW >>
18/03/2010 - 2.00 Politics & Society The 9/11 Trial: Selling Out the Rule of Law?
16/03/2010 - 21.35 Politics & Society U.S. / Statement by Cardinal Francis George on Health Care Reform
14/03/2010 - 19.00 Politics & Society HEALTH CARE / How did we get to this place?
08/03/2010 - 0.30 Politics & Society HEALTH CARE / A reform at risk of being DOA.
05/03/2010 - 2.00 Politics & Society THE TEA PARTY MOVEMENT / Even Grassroots Need to Grow up Some Day
03/03/2010 - 2.00 Politics & Society U.S. / A Republican Woodstock?
Tutte le Notizie di Politics & Society
17.28 Motori Moto: il Gp d'Aragona sostituisce quello d'Ungheria
17.17 Esteri Turchia: golpe mancato, altri 28 arresti
17.16 Politica Rai: azienda, Busi escluso da tutte le trasmissioni
17.14 Esteri Start: Mosca, siamo in dirittura d'arrivo
17.10 Calcio e altri Sport Nuoto: trofeo Settecolli a Pescara
17.07 Calcio e altri Sport CALCIOMERCATO/ Napoli, Hamsik rinnova, addio Inter e Manchester!